I have a trap receiver (beta) set up and currently receiving traps. How do I add the trap list (messages) in my map as an object?


Article Comments

this is not yet possible, sorry.

It is likely that this will be available in the near future.


Jan, 2015 - Permalink

Hi, i have the same problem. Is ist possible now in version 15.3.18.3616? To show snmp trap or syslog massages in a list on the map?


Aug, 2015 - Permalink

Dear dhoetzel

There is no map object for those messages yet. It is currently not in development either, I am sorry. Showing trap or syslog messages on the map has still the status of a feature request.


Aug, 2015 - Permalink

Hi, Is there any plan to make such feature which show syslog receiver messages in any table in map? If yes - when it can be deployed?


Nov, 2015 - Permalink

Dear bradwan

Currently we focus on other map improvements. I am sorry, I can give you no timeline or estimate for syslog messages in maps, as it currently does not have the priority to get on one on the shorter lists.


Nov, 2015 - Permalink

How about now? It would be great if we can have snmp traps display on a map rather than have to go directly in to the sensor to see the traps.


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

Dear Barry

This is still something we have not implemented, even though we deem it useful. The reason is a current architecture limitation. Instead of adding workarounds, we rather take the time to improve the underlying architecture.


Feb, 2016 - Permalink

We need this feature too. Now it's more than two years after this feature request was created. Do you have an update if this feature is still on the roadmap or in development?


Sep, 2017 - Permalink

Hi,

Sorry, it has not been revisited ever since. As Arne mentioned, the underlying architecture is a bit of a problem. The easiest way to achieve this is probably to use Grafana as a map software and have the SNMP traps logged into a SQL database.

In our Tech Support Department, we're using Grafana as well (with the PRTG plugin) in order to allow for dynamic changes and a coherent, consistent layout.


Kind regards,
Stephan Linke, Tech Support Team


Sep, 2017 - Permalink

Hi, is this still not supported?


Dec, 2020 - Permalink

Correct, yes. Please see the best answer of this thread (the one above yours) for a interim solution. This will likely not get implemented natively in PRTG for the time being. Sorry for the troubles :(


Dec, 2020 - Permalink