On the Overview tab, under Network Infrastructure, DNS/Gateway/DHCP: 10.0.0.1, I get two messages for each of ports 465, 993, and 995. I don't know what they mean or what, if anything, should be done about them:
"Failed to establish secure connection [Step 0] Socket Error # 10054 Connection reset by peer. [Step 1] Socket Error # 10054 Connection reset by peer. [Step 2] Socket Error # 10054 Connection reset by peer. [Step 3] Socket Error # 10054 Connection reset by peer. [Step 4] Socket Error # 10054 Connection reset by peer." |
"Error by lookup value 'No Secure Protocol Available' in Security Rating" |
Article Comments
Since the TCP connection was actively closed ("Socket Error # 10054 Connection reset by peer") it looks like being caused by the firewall configuration, the wrong ports used, or possibly flood protection.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink
If you want to monitor those DHCP ports, they must be open and the firewall must allow PRTG to access them. If you don't need these ports monitored, you can delete or pause the sensors in question.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink
I'm still having trouble with this. I'm over my head, but I'm hoping you can help. I checked Inbound Rules in Windows Firewall and all four PRTG listings show "Any" under both Local Port and Remote Port. What else should I check? Thanks.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink
Dear Rick
In this case please check the log of the DHCP if you can find any connection related messages. For example it could be the case that a flood protection applies.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink
Dear Rick
This depends. Please contact the admin responsible for this DHCP server.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink
Dear Rick
In this case, I don't think this sensor provides useful information unless there is a reason to specifically monitor these ports.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink
Dear Rick
When the sensor tries to connect, it uses the most secure connection protocol available. If no connection is possible, the next best protocol is used. The error message shows that none of the supported protocols (via TLS, SSL) were accepted by the device.
Sep, 2016 - Permalink